![]() whereas the responsible Chinese authorities have denied the allegations of massive and structural human rights violations in Xinjiang ĭ. whereas the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and a number of international media outlets, including the BBC, Spain’s El Pais, France’s Le Monde and Germany’s Der Spiegel, were able to examine the Xinjiang police files Ĭ. whereas the promotion of and respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law should be at the centre of the EU’s relations with China, in line with the EU’s commitment to uphold these values in its external action and China’s commitment to adhere to them in its own development and international cooperation ī. – having regard to Rules 144(5) and 132(4) of its Rules of Procedure,Ī. – having regard to Article 36 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, which guarantees all citizens the right to freedom of religious belief, and to Article 4 thereof, which upholds the rights of ethnic minorities, – having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989, – having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 (3) and to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 of 7 December 2020 (4) concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses, ![]() – having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 16 December 1966, – having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, – having regard to its previous resolutions and reports on the situation in China, in particular those of 17 December 2020 on forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (1) and of 19 December 2019 on the situation of the Uyghurs in China (China Cables) (2), The call for a Convention for the revision of the TreatiesĪ new trade instrument to ban products made by forced labourĮuropean Parliament resolution of 9 June 2022 on the human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang police files ( 2022/2700(RSP)) Global threats to abortion rights: the possible overturn of abortion rights in the US by the Supreme Court International procurement instrument ***I The rule of law and the potential approval of the Polish national Recovery Plan (RRF) Violations of media freedom and safety of journalists in Georgia The instrumentalisation of justice as a repressive tool in Nicaragua It looks like the glitch might be related to disconnects, so that could be the first area for Riot to investigate.The human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang police files If it starts to pop up more frequently, a quick fix patch must be implemented. Although it doesn’t look like it’s constantly happening in games, Riot should keep a vigilant eye on possible recreations. This glitch is one of the worst we’ve seen in VALORANT to date. ![]() But this also meant that she picked up the loss with her newfound teammates. ![]() As a result, her friends were able to grab an easy win. Vienna could also tell her original teammates where the enemy team was planning to go in true secret agent fashion. But since they were on the enemy team now, they were all in red. Whenever her teammates talked, their names would normally appear in white. Vienna could still talk to her original teammates, but it now said on the top of her screen that it was six-vs-four. She was also no longer Sage-as she had chosen before the match-but was Sova instead. When she reconnected to the game, she realized that she spawned in on the enemy team. Secret Agent BTW /T5eMRhb9fp- C9 Vienna April 21, 2020 I JUST GOT DCED IN MY 11-12 VALORANT GAME, THEN PLACED ON THE ENEMY TEAM AS A DIFFERENT CHARACTER. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |